Puducherry Outgoing MLA deatils
Dear Friends,
Puducherry Election Watch and Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) have analyzed the affidavits of
Dear Friends,
Puducherry Election Watch and Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) have analyzed the affidavits of 27 outgoing MLAs who are contesting again in the 2016 PuducherryAssembly Elections.Please find a summary of the analysis below:
- Average Assets in 2011 Elections: The average assets of these 27 re-contesting MLAs fielded by various parties including independents in 2011 were Rs 4.87 crores (Rs. 4, 87, 76, 060).
- Average Assets in 2016 Elections: The average assets of these 27 re-contesting MLAs in 2016 is Rs 11.92 crores (Rs. 11, 92, 31,184).
- Average Asset change from 2011 to 2016: The average assets of these 27re- contesting MLAs, between the Puducherry Elections of 2011 and 2016 increased by Rs. 7.04 crores (Rs. 7, 04,55,123).
- Percentage change in assets from 2011 to 2016:Average percentage increase in assets for these 27 re-contesting MLAs is144%.
- Highest growth in Assets from 2011 to 2016:
Name
|
Party in Puducherry 2016
|
Party in Puducherry 2011
|
Constituency in Puducherry 2016
|
Constituency in Puducherry 2011
|
Assets in Puducherry 2016 (Rs.)
|
Assets in Puducherry 2011 (Rs.)
|
Asset Increase(Rs.)
|
% Increase in Asset
| |
1.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
THATTANCHAVADY
|
THATTANCHAVADY
|
1,24,83,61,601
124 Crore+ |
42,31,88,241
42 Crore+ |
82,51,73,360
82 Crore+ |
195%
| |
2.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
INDIRA NAGAR
|
KADIRGAMAM
|
29,53,04,640
29 Crore+ |
5,16,36,000
5 Crore+ |
24,36,68,640
24 Crore+ |
472%
| |
3.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
ORLEAMPETH
|
ORLEAMPETH
|
35,68,20,966
35 Crore+ |
14,37,20,771
14 Crore+ |
21,31,00,195
21 Crore+ |
148%
| |
4.
|
INC
|
INC
|
VILLIANUR
|
VILLIANUR
|
26,61,26,713
26 Crore+ |
7,39,82,875
7 Crore+ |
19,21,43,838
19 Crore+ |
260%
| |
5.
|
AIADMK
|
AIADMK
|
MUDALIARPET
|
MUDALIARPET
|
10,67,52,351
10 Crore+ |
4,22,53,243
4 Crore+ |
6,44,99,108
6 Crore+ |
153%
|
Table 1: Highest growth in Assets (Top 5)
· Average asset change of re-contesting MLAs: Party-Wise: The table below provides the party-wise categorization of increase in average assets of re-contesting MLAs. Financial details of 27 re-contesting MLAs fielded by various political parties have been taken from the recently filed affidavits by these MLAs and the values of these financial assets have been compared to the corresponding values of the assets that the MLAs showed in their affidavits in 2011. Following table showcases the party wise assortment of the average increase in assets of the re-contesting MLAs:
S.No.
|
Party in Puducherry 2016
|
Total Number of MLAs
|
Average Assets in Puducherry 2016 (Rs.)
|
Average Assets in Puducherry 2011 (Rs.)
|
Average Asset Increase (Rs.)
|
Average
% Increase in Asset |
1.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
12
|
19,38,04,961
19 Crore+ |
7,38,44,018
7 Crore+ |
11,99,60,943
11 Crore+ |
162.45%
|
2.
|
INC
|
6
|
7,73,83,000
7 Crore+ |
3,55,55,995
3 Crore+ |
4,18,27,005
4 Crore+ |
117.64%
|
3.
|
AIADMK
|
5
|
5,52,52,537
5 Crore+ |
3,29,52,251
3 Crore+ |
2,23,00,286
2 Crore+ |
67.67%
|
4.
|
IND
|
3
|
4,86,29,185
4 Crore+ |
1,67,04,498
1 Crore+ |
3,19,24,687
3 Crore+ |
191.11%
|
5.
|
DMK
|
1
|
71,34,205
71 Lacs+ |
26,14,709
26 Lacs+ |
45,19,496
45 Lacs+ |
172.85%
|
GRAND TOTAL
|
27
|
11,92,31,184.14
11 Crore+ |
4,87,76,060.77
4 Crore+ |
7,04,55,123.37
7 Crore+ |
144%
|
Table 2: Average Asset change of Re-contesting MLAs – Party-wise
Media and Journalist Helpline
+91 80103 94248
Email:adr@adrindia.org
|
Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd)
Head
National Election Watch,
Association for Democratic Reforms
011 4165 4200,
+91 88264 79910
adr@adrIndia.org,
|
Prof Jagdeep Chhokar
IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.)
Founder Member,
National Election Watch, Association for Democratic
Reforms
+91 99996 20944
|
Prof Trilochan Sastry
IIM Bangalore
Founder Member,
National Election Watch,
Association for Democratic Reforms
+91 94483 53285
|
—
Association for Democratic Reforms
T-95A, C.L. House, 1st Floor,
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049
who are contesting again in the
Dear Friends,
Puducherry Election Watch and Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) have analyzed the affidavits of 27 outgoing MLAs who are contesting again in the 2016 PuducherryAssembly Elections.Please find a summary of the analysis below:
- Average Assets in 2011 Elections: The average assets of these 27 re-contesting MLAs fielded by various parties including independents in 2011 were Rs 4.87 crores (Rs. 4, 87, 76, 060).
- Average Assets in 2016 Elections: The average assets of these 27 re-contesting MLAs in 2016 is Rs 11.92 crores (Rs. 11, 92, 31,184).
- Average Asset change from 2011 to 2016: The average assets of these 27re- contesting MLAs, between the Puducherry Elections of 2011 and 2016 increased by Rs. 7.04 crores (Rs. 7, 04,55,123).
- Percentage change in assets from 2011 to 2016:Average percentage increase in assets for these 27 re-contesting MLAs is144%.
- Highest growth in Assets from 2011 to 2016:
Name
|
Party in Puducherry 2016
|
Party in Puducherry 2011
|
Constituency in Puducherry 2016
|
Constituency in Puducherry 2011
|
Assets in Puducherry 2016 (Rs.)
|
Assets in Puducherry 2011 (Rs.)
|
Asset Increase(Rs.)
|
% Increase in Asset
| |
1.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
THATTANCHAVADY
|
THATTANCHAVADY
|
1,24,83,61,601
124 Crore+ |
42,31,88,241
42 Crore+ |
82,51,73,360
82 Crore+ |
195%
| |
2.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
INDIRA NAGAR
|
KADIRGAMAM
|
29,53,04,640
29 Crore+ |
5,16,36,000
5 Crore+ |
24,36,68,640
24 Crore+ |
472%
| |
3.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
ORLEAMPETH
|
ORLEAMPETH
|
35,68,20,966
35 Crore+ |
14,37,20,771
14 Crore+ |
21,31,00,195
21 Crore+ |
148%
| |
4.
|
INC
|
INC
|
VILLIANUR
|
VILLIANUR
|
26,61,26,713
26 Crore+ |
7,39,82,875
7 Crore+ |
19,21,43,838
19 Crore+ |
260%
| |
5.
|
AIADMK
|
AIADMK
|
MUDALIARPET
|
MUDALIARPET
|
10,67,52,351
10 Crore+ |
4,22,53,243
4 Crore+ |
6,44,99,108
6 Crore+ |
153%
|
Table 1: Highest growth in Assets (Top 5)
· Average asset change of re-contesting MLAs: Party-Wise: The table below provides the party-wise categorization of increase in average assets of re-contesting MLAs. Financial details of 27 re-contesting MLAs fielded by various political parties have been taken from the recently filed affidavits by these MLAs and the values of these financial assets have been compared to the corresponding values of the assets that the MLAs showed in their affidavits in 2011. Following table showcases the party wise assortment of the average increase in assets of the re-contesting MLAs:
S.No.
|
Party in Puducherry 2016
|
Total Number of MLAs
|
Average Assets in Puducherry 2016 (Rs.)
|
Average Assets in Puducherry 2011 (Rs.)
|
Average Asset Increase (Rs.)
|
Average
% Increase in Asset |
1.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
12
|
19,38,04,961
19 Crore+ |
7,38,44,018
7 Crore+ |
11,99,60,943
11 Crore+ |
162.45%
|
2.
|
INC
|
6
|
7,73,83,000
7 Crore+ |
3,55,55,995
3 Crore+ |
4,18,27,005
4 Crore+ |
117.64%
|
3.
|
AIADMK
|
5
|
5,52,52,537
5 Crore+ |
3,29,52,251
3 Crore+ |
2,23,00,286
2 Crore+ |
67.67%
|
4.
|
IND
|
3
|
4,86,29,185
4 Crore+ |
1,67,04,498
1 Crore+ |
3,19,24,687
3 Crore+ |
191.11%
|
5.
|
DMK
|
1
|
71,34,205
71 Lacs+ |
26,14,709
26 Lacs+ |
45,19,496
45 Lacs+ |
172.85%
|
GRAND TOTAL
|
27
|
11,92,31,184.14
11 Crore+ |
4,87,76,060.77
4 Crore+ |
7,04,55,123.37
7 Crore+ |
144%
|
Table 2: Average Asset change of Re-contesting MLAs – Party-wise
Media and Journalist Helpline
+91 80103 94248
Email:adr@adrindia.org
|
Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd)
Head
National Election Watch,
Association for Democratic Reforms
011 4165 4200,
+91 88264 79910
adr@adrIndia.org,
|
Prof Jagdeep Chhokar
IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.)
Founder Member,
National Election Watch, Association for Democratic
Reforms
+91 99996 20944
|
Prof Trilochan Sastry
IIM Bangalore
Founder Member,
National Election Watch,
Association for Democratic Reforms
+91 94483 53285
|
—
Association for Democratic Reforms
T-95A, C.L. House, 1st Floor,
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049
Please find a summary of the analysis below:
- Average Assets in 2011 Elections: The average assets of these 27 re-contesting MLAs fielded by various parties including independents in 2011 were Rs 4.87 crores (Rs. 4, 87, 76, 060).
- Average Assets in 2016 Elections: The average assets of these 27 re-contesting MLAs in 2016 is Rs 11.92 crores (Rs. 11, 92, 31,184).
- Average Asset change from 2011 to 2016: The average assets of these 27re- contesting MLAs, between the Puducherry Elections of 2011 and 2016 increased by Rs. 7.04 crores (Rs. 7, 04,55,123).
- Percentage change in assets from 2011 to 2016:Average percentage increase in assets for these 27 re-contesting MLAs is144%.
- Highest growth in Assets from 2011 to 2016:
Name
|
Party in Puducherry 2016
|
Party in Puducherry 2011
|
Constituency in Puducherry 2016
|
Constituency in Puducherry 2011
|
Assets in Puducherry 2016 (Rs.)
|
Assets in Puducherry 2011 (Rs.)
|
Asset Increase(Rs.)
|
% Increase in Asset
| |
1.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
THATTANCHAVADY
|
THATTANCHAVADY
|
1,24,83,61,601
124 Crore+ |
42,31,88,241
42 Crore+ |
82,51,73,360
82 Crore+ |
195%
| |
2.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
INDIRA NAGAR
|
KADIRGAMAM
|
29,53,04,640
29 Crore+ |
5,16,36,000
5 Crore+ |
24,36,68,640
24 Crore+ |
472%
| |
3.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
ORLEAMPETH
|
ORLEAMPETH
|
35,68,20,966
35 Crore+ |
14,37,20,771
14 Crore+ |
21,31,00,195
21 Crore+ |
148%
| |
4.
|
INC
|
INC
|
VILLIANUR
|
VILLIANUR
|
26,61,26,713
26 Crore+ |
7,39,82,875
7 Crore+ |
19,21,43,838
19 Crore+ |
260%
| |
5.
|
AIADMK
|
AIADMK
|
MUDALIARPET
|
MUDALIARPET
|
10,67,52,351
10 Crore+ |
4,22,53,243
4 Crore+ |
6,44,99,108
6 Crore+ |
153%
|
Table 1: Highest growth in Assets (Top 5)
· Average asset change of re-contesting MLAs: Party-Wise: The table below provides the party-wise categorization of increase in average assets of re-contesting MLAs. Financial details of 27 re-contesting MLAs fielded by various political parties have been taken from the recently filed affidavits by these MLAs and the values of these financial assets have been compared to the corresponding values of the assets that the MLAs showed in their affidavits in 2011. Following table showcases the party wise assortment of the average increase in assets of the re-contesting MLAs:
S.No.
|
Party in Puducherry 2016
|
Total Number of MLAs
|
Average Assets in Puducherry 2016 (Rs.)
|
Average Assets in Puducherry 2011 (Rs.)
|
Average Asset Increase (Rs.)
|
Average
% Increase in Asset |
1.
|
All India N.R. Congress
|
12
|
19,38,04,961
19 Crore+ |
7,38,44,018
7 Crore+ |
11,99,60,943
11 Crore+ |
162.45%
|
2.
|
INC
|
6
|
7,73,83,000
7 Crore+ |
3,55,55,995
3 Crore+ |
4,18,27,005
4 Crore+ |
117.64%
|
3.
|
AIADMK
|
5
|
5,52,52,537
5 Crore+ |
3,29,52,251
3 Crore+ |
2,23,00,286
2 Crore+ |
67.67%
|
4.
|
IND
|
3
|
4,86,29,185
4 Crore+ |
1,67,04,498
1 Crore+ |
3,19,24,687
3 Crore+ |
191.11%
|
5.
|
DMK
|
1
|
71,34,205
71 Lacs+ |
26,14,709
26 Lacs+ |
45,19,496
45 Lacs+ |
172.85%
|
GRAND TOTAL
|
27
|
11,92,31,184.14
11 Crore+ |
4,87,76,060.77
4 Crore+ |
7,04,55,123.37
7 Crore+ |
144%
|
Table 2: Average Asset change of Re-contesting MLAs – Party-wise
Media and Journalist Helpline
+91 80103 94248
Email:adr@adrindia.org
|
Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd)
Head
National Election Watch,
Association for Democratic Reforms
011 4165 4200,
+91 88264 79910
adr@adrIndia.org,
|
Prof Jagdeep Chhokar
IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.)
Founder Member,
National Election Watch, Association for Democratic
Reforms
+91 99996 20944
|
Prof Trilochan Sastry
IIM Bangalore
Founder Member,
National Election Watch,
Association for Democratic Reforms
+91 94483 53285
|
—
Association for Democratic Reforms
T-95A, C.L. House, 1st Floor,
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049
The Asian news Daily
Newdelhi Samachara
Shared by
Naresh Kumar Sagar
Naresh Kumar Sagar
newdelhisamachara.wordpress.com – interalex.net – May 8, 2016 ASIA Sports News, May 08, 2016 Asian Football News – FOX SPORTShttp://www.foxsportsasia.com/football/asian-football/news/ Get the latest sports news, scores, fixtures, …
Ind Mine News
Shared by
Sagar Media Inc
Sagar Media Inc
indminenews.wordpress.com – interalex.net – May 8, 2016 ASIA Sports News, May 08, 2016 Asian Football News – FOX SPORTShttp://www.foxsportsasia.com/football/asian-football/news/ Get the latest sports news, scores, fixtures, …
Asean News
Shared by
Naresh Kumar Sagar
Naresh Kumar Sagar
aseannews.wordpress.com – interalex.net – May 8, 2016 ASIA Sports News, May 08, 2016 Asian Football News – FOX SPORTShttp://www.foxsportsasia.com/football/asian-football/news/ Get the latest sports news, scores, fixtures, …
Sagar Media in
Shared by
Sagar Media Inc
Sagar Media Inc
enkaysagar.wordpress.com – interalex.net – May 8, 2016 ASIA Sports News, May 08, 2016 Asian Football News – FOX SPORTShttp://www.foxsportsasia.com/football/asian-football/news/ Get the latest sports news, scores, fixtures, …
Smart SC Issues ‘DROUGHT MANAGEMENT’ Guidelines
May12, 2016 (C) Ravinder Singh progressindia2015@gmail.com
We are fortunate to have in Justice TS Thakur led Supreme Court which is Smartest of All in the world.
What is even more thrilling is in the last lines of the Guidelines –
‘Humanitarian factors such as migrations from affected areas, suicides, extreme distress, the plight of women and children are some of the factors that ought to be kept in mind by State Governments in matters pertaining to drought and the Government of India in updating and revising the Manual.’
As given in the annexure as Gujarat received Deficient Rainfall Empowered Group of Ministers went to Gujarat on August04 2012 to ASSESS THE DROUGHT SITUATION within 5-6 weeks of onset of monsoon all over India.
Entire Gujarat Cabinet met EGoM but no such assessment of Drought was carried out in two consequent droughts.
Lok Sabha debate was most disappointing. LOK SABHA didn’t invite EXPERTS or even CWC to give Presentation on Drought Situation.
Ravinder Singh, Inventor & Consultant, INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND PROJECTS
Y-77, Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110016, India. Ph; 091- 9871056471, 9718280435, 9650421857
Invitation to the finale of GAIL Indian Speedstar on 12.05.2016
Dear Friends,
GAIL has launched a national level initiative titled ‘GAIL Indian Speedstar’ aimed at scouting young talent of the age group 11 to 17 years in the field of athletics from remote areas/disadvantaged communities of India and endeavors to provide world-class training to the winning athletes of the Speedstar contest for preparing them to compete at Olympics 2020, Tokyo for various track events (100m, 200m and 800m).
Through an intensive two tier selection process covering 55 districts across 11 States, 90 potential candidates have been shortlisted for the finals of the GAIL Indian Speedstar contest to be held on 12th May 2016 at 1830 hrs., Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, New Delhi.
Shri Arun Jaitley, Hon’ble Minister for Finance and Information & Broadcasting, has kindly consented to grace this occasion as the Chief Guest and Shri Dharmendra Pradhan, Hon’ble Minister of State (IC), Petroleum and Natural Gas will be the Guest of Honour at the event.
You are cordially invited to grace the occasion at the Finale of ‘GAIL Indian Speedstar’ and encourage the aspiring youngsters.
Looking forward to your presence at this prestigious event at Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Lodhi Road, New Delhi starting at 1830 Hrs on 12th May 2016.
Best regards,
Vandana Chanana
Executive Director (CC&CSR)
Executive Director (CC&CSR)
Kerala Assembly Elections candidates analysed
Press Release
Dear Friends,
Kerala Election Watch and Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) have analysed the self-sworn affidavits of 1125 out of the 1203 candidates who are contesting in the Kerala Assembly Electionsto be held on 16th May 2016 (78 Candidates were not analysed due to unclear affidavits available on the website of the ECI & CEO, Kerala).
Criminal Background
· Candidates with Criminal Cases: Out of the 1125candidates, 311 (28%) candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves.
· Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: 138 (12%) candidates have declared serious criminal cases including cases related to murder, attempt to murder, rape, kidnapping, dacoity crimes against womenetc.
· Candidates with cases related to murder: 4 candidates have declared charges related to murder (Indian Penal Code Section-302).
· Candidates with cases related to Attempt to Murder: 19 candidates have declared charges related to attempt to murder (Indian Penal Code Section-307).
· Candidates with cases related to Crimes against Women: 11 candidates have declared charges related to crimes against women.
· Candidates with cases related to Rape: 1 candidate namely Shajahan. S of an Independent fromParassala constituency has declared 1 charge related to Rape (Indian Penal Code Section-376).
· Party wise Candidates with Criminal Cases: 72 (86%) out of 84 candidates from CPI(M), 42 (43%)out of 97 candidates from BJP, 37 (44%)out of 85 candidates from INC, 13 (36%) out of 36 candidates fielded byBharath Dharma Jana Sena, 15 (60%) out of 25 candidates from CPI, 6 (26%) out of 23 from IUML, 25 (31%) out of 80 from SDPI and 43 (11%) out of 387 Independent candidates have declared criminal cases against themselves in their affidavits.
· Party wise Candidates with Serious Criminal Cases: 26 (31%) out of 84 candidates from CPI(M),23 (24%) out of 97 candidates from BJP, 23 (27%)out of 85 candidates from INC, 7 (19%) out of 36 candidates fielded byBharath Dharma Jana Sena, 4 (16%) out of 25 candidates from CPI, 1 (4%)out of 23 from IUML, 7 (9%) out of 80 from SDPI and 27 (7%) out of 387Independent candidates have declared serious criminal cases against themselves in their affidavits.
· Red Alert Constituencies*: 48 constituencies in the Kerala assembly elections have 3 or more candidates with declared criminal cases.
*Red Alert Constituencies are those which have 3 or more candidates with criminal cases contesting elections.
Financial Background
· Share of wealth among candidates : The share of wealth amongst the candidates contesting in the Kerala Assembly Elections is as follows:
Value of assets (Rs.)
|
No of candidates
|
Percentage of Candidates
|
5 cr and above
|
50
|
4%
|
2 crores to 5 crores
|
60
|
5%
|
50 lakhs to 2 crores
|
264
|
23%
|
10 lakhs to 50 lakhs
|
353
|
31%
|
less than 10 lakhs
|
398
|
35%
|
Table: Share of wealth amongst contesting candidates
· High asset candidates*: The 3 richest candidates contesting in the Kerala Assembly Elections are given below:
S.No.
|
Name
|
District
|
Constituency
|
Party Name
|
Movable Assets (Rs)
|
Immovable Assets (Rs)
|
Total Assets (Rs)
|
PAN Given
|
1
|
THIRUVANANTHAPUR
|
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
|
AIADMK
|
1,09,74,82,707
|
78,44,06,000
|
1,88,18,88,707
188 Crore+ |
Y
| |
2
|
ALAPPUZHA
|
KUTTANAD
|
NCP
|
83,80,68,033
|
8,56,92,000
|
92,37,60,033
92 Crore+ |
Y
| |
3
|
IDUKKI
|
PEERUMADE
|
AIADMK
|
18,27,88,000
|
36,35,00,000
|
54,62,88,000
54 Crore+ |
Y
|
Table: Top three candidates with highest declared assets
· Crorepati Candidates: Out of the 1125 candidates, 202 (18%) are crorepatis.
· Party wise Crorepati Candidates: 43 (51%) out of 85 candidates fromINC, 24 (29%) out of 84 candidates from CPI(M), 18 (19%) out of 97candidates from BJP, 18 (50%) out of 36 candidates from Bharath Dharma Jana Sena, 2 (29%) out of 7 candidates from AIADMK, 17 (74%) out of 23 candidates from IUML, 9 (60%) out of 15 candidates from Kerala Congress (M) and 30 (8%) out of 387 Independent candidates have declared assets worth Rs 1 Crore and above in their affidavits.
· Average assets: The average of assets per candidate contesting in the Kerala Assembly Elections is Rs 1.28 Crores.
· Party wise average assets: Among major parties, the average assets per candidate for 85 INC candidates isRs 1.83 Crores, 97 BJP candidates have average assets of Rs 1.03 Crores, 84 CPI(M) candidates have average assets worth Rs 1.51 Crores, 7 AIADMK candidates have average assets of Rs 35.14 Crores, 36 Bharath Dharma Jana Sena candidates have average assets worth Rs 3.19 Crores, 25 CPI candidates have average assets worth Rs 71.16 Lakhs, average assets of 23 IUML candidates is Rs 4.21 Crores, 15 Kerala Congress (M)candidates have average assets of Rs 3.16 Crores, 7 JD(U)candidates have average assets of Rs 5.25 Crores, 5 JD(S) candidates have average assets of Rs 4.59 Crores and 387 Independent candidates have average assets ofRs. 43.87 Lakhs.
· Zero asset candidates: 7 candidates have declared zero assets in their self sworn affidavits. The list is given below:
S.No.
|
Name
|
District
|
Constituency
|
Party Name
|
Movable Assets (Rs)
|
Immovable Assets (Rs)
|
Total Assets (Rs)
|
PAN Given
|
1
|
WAYANAD
|
KALPETTA
|
IND
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
N
| |
2
|
ERNAKULAM
|
KALAMASSERY
|
IND
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
N
| |
3
|
ERNAKULAM
|
VYPEN
|
IND
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
N
| |
4
|
ERNAKULAM
|
THRIKKAKARA
|
IND
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Y
| |
5
|
ALAPPUZHA
|
CHENGANNUR
|
IND
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
N
| |
6
|
PATHANAMTHITTA
|
ARANMULA
|
IND
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
N
| |
7
|
THIRUVANANTHAPUR
|
NEMOM
|
IND
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
N
|
Table: Zero asset candidates
· Low asset candidates: The three candidates with lowest assets are as follows:
S.No.
|
Name
|
District
|
Constituency
|
Party Name
|
Movable Assets (Rs)
|
Immovable Assets (Rs)
|
Total Assets (Rs)
|
PAN Given
|
1
|
WAYANAD
|
MANANTHAVADY
|
IND
|
100
|
0
|
100
1 Hund+ |
N
| |
2
|
KOTTAYAM
|
KANJIRAPPALLY
|
IND
|
100
|
0
|
100
1 Hund+ |
N
| |
3
|
THIRUVANANTHAPUR
|
PARASSALA
|
BSP
|
100
|
0
|
100
1 Hund+ |
N
|
Table: Candidates with declared lowest assets
· Candidates with high liabilities: The top three candidates with highest liabilities are as given below;
S.No.
|
Name
|
District
|
Constituency
|
Party Name
|
Total Assets(Rs)
|
Liabilities (Rs)
|
1
|
THIRUVANANTHAPUR
|
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
|
AIADMK
|
1,88,18,88,707
188 Crore+ |
18,33,42,272
18 Crore+ | |
2
|
KOTTAYAM
|
PALA
|
NCP
|
28,52,78,630
28 Crore+ |
13,89,75,143
13 Crore+ | |
3
|
IDUKKI
|
PEERUMADE
|
AIADMK
|
54,62,88,000
54 Crore+ |
10,72,00,000
10 Crore+ |
Table: Top three candidates with high liabilities
· Undeclared PAN: A total of 496 (44%) candidates out of the 1125 analyzed have not declared their PAN details.
Candidates with high income as declared in the ITR*: 5 candidates have declared total annual income of more than Rs 1 crore. These candidates are as given below: (Note: – Annual Income & Assets declared by K Muraleedharan amount to an identical figure i.e. Rs 13,04,42,521. This may be a coincidence or could be a possible mistake made by the candidate while filling in his affidavit)
S.No.
|
Name
|
Party Name
|
Constituency
|
District Name
|
Total Asset (Rs)
|
The financial year for which the last income tax return has been filed by candidate
|
Total income shown by candidate in ITR (Self+Spouse+Dependent) (Rs)
|
Self income shown by candidate in ITR (Rs)
|
1
|
INC
|
VATTIYOORKAVU
|
THIRUVANANTHAPUR
|
13,04,42,521
13 Crore+
|
2015-2016
|
13,04,42,521
13 Crore+
|
7,45,05,903
7 Crore+
| |
2
|
AIADMK
|
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
|
THIRUVANANTHAPUR
|
1,88,18,88,707
188 Crore+
|
2014-2015
|
9,60,50,674
9 Crore+
|
4,21,49,503
4 Crore+
| |
3
|
CPI(M)
|
BEYPORE
|
KOZHIKODE
|
30,41,45,261
30 Crore+
|
2014-2015
|
3,05,91,768
3 Crore+
|
2,87,98,277
2 Crore+
| |
4
|
Kerala Congress (B)
|
PATHANAPURAM
|
KOLLAM
|
22,21,33,032
22 Crore+
|
2014-2015
|
2,11,85,490
2 Crore+
|
11,85,490
11 Lacs+
| |
5
|
Kerala Congress (M)
|
KOTHAMANGALAM
|
ERNAKULAM
|
17,42,87,488
17 Crore+
|
2014-2015
|
1,93,69,400
1 Crore+
|
1,90,33,890
1 Crore+
|
Table: Candidates with high income as declared in ITR
*Total income includes income of self, spouse and dependents
· Candidates who have not declared Income Tax Details*: 834 (74%) out of 1125 candidates analyzed have not declared income tax details.
* Some candidates may be exempted from filing Income Tax Returns
· Candidates with high Assets who have not declared Income Tax Details*:68 candidates with assets worth more than Rs. 1 crore have not declared Income Tax details. The top three candidates with highest assets who have not declared their IT returns are as given below:
S.No.
|
Name
|
District
|
Constituency
|
Party Name
|
Total Income (Rs)
|
Movable Assets (Rs)
|
Immovable Assets (Rs)
|
Total Assets (Rs)
|
PAN Given
|
Self Income
|
1
|
KASARAGOD
|
KANHANGAD
|
Bharath Dharma Jana Sena
|
0
|
8,01,93,574
|
1,41,20,000
|
9,43,13,574
9 Crore+
|
Y
|
ITR not filed
| |
2
|
PALAKKAD
|
SHORNUR
|
CPI(M)
|
0
|
32,66,764
|
6,35,00,000
|
6,67,66,764
6 Crore+
|
N
|
ITR not filed
| |
3
|
ALAPPUZHA
|
AROOR
|
INC
|
1161183
|
54,33,633
|
5,20,23,000*
|
5,74,56,633
5 Crore+
|
Y
|
ITR not filed
|
Table: Top three candidates with highest assets who have not declared ITR details
* Some candidates may be exempted from filing Income Tax Returns
Other Background Details
· Education details of candidates: 669 (59%) candidates have declared their education qualification to be between 5th pass and 12th pass, while380 (34%) candidates have declared having an educational qualification ofgraduate or above. 29 candidates have declared themselves to be simpleliterates and 7 candidates have declared to be an illiterate.
· Age details of candidates: 656 (58%) candidates have declared their age to be between 25 and 50 yearswhile 461 (41%) candidates have declared their age to be between 51 and 80 years. While 6 candidates have disclosed to be older than 80 years of age, 2 candidates have not disclosed their age details.
· Gender details of candidates: 104 (9%) women candidates are contesting in the Kerala assembly election this year.
Media and Journalist Helpline
+91 80103 94248
Email:adr@adrindia.org
| Maj.Gen. Anil Verma (Retd)
Head
National Election Watch,
Association for Democratic Reforms
011 4165 4200,
+91 88264 79910
adr@adrIndia.org,
| Prof Jagdeep Chhokar
IIM Ahmedabad (Retd.)
Founder Member,
National Election Watch, Association for Democratic
Reforms
+91 99996 20944
| Prof Trilochan Sastry
IIM Bangalore
Founder Member,
National Election Watch,
Association for Democratic Reforms
+91 94483 53285
|
—
Association for Democratic Reforms
T-95A, C.L. House, 1st Floor,
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049
(Near Gulmohar Commercial Complex)
Gautam Nagar
New Delhi-110 049
India Country Programme Evaluation
Standard
IFAD is doing wonderful work for development of agriculture development both in funding and science to bring the sea change in the spectrum of value chains. Q to depleting soil and water the farmers are provided adequate knowledge for high-value products.IFAD is active in Maharasthara Madhya Prasesh and the North Eastern States .
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and the Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) of the Ministry of Finance of India hold a workshop on the India Country ProgrammeEvaluation conducted by the Independent Office of Evaluation of IFAD. The event is taking place in New Delhi on Thursday, 12 May 2016. The venue of the workshop is the Regency Ball Room at the Hyatt Regency Hotel,Bhikaiji Cama Place, Ring Road, New Delhi.
The objectives of the above workshop are to: (i) discuss the main findings and strategic recommendations emerging from the recent IFAD IndiaCountry Programme Evaluation and; (ii) provide an opportunity for reflecting on key issues and strategic priorities for the forthcoming India Country Strategic Opportunities Programme.
The workshop will be attended by representatives from the Government of India, IFAD Management and Staff,NGOs and civil society organizations (national and international), directors of IFAD-funded projects and programmes, academics and research institutions, private sector and foundations, international donors and selected resource persons.
No comments:
Post a Comment